It’s a blessing to understand this. And coincidentally (?) the same theme I heard last week from a priest in the Christian Community. You and Judith are both treasures and bring light to this world. Thank you.
Yesterday's blog was so ... wow. More on it later. This one, though.... That mistranslation is huge. What does a woman look like who is not being seductive, not dressing/performing for the gaze of men or in competition with other women? Who is being only her full, true self, regardless of her relationships? Can she stay in a marriage if the institution itself is based on patriarchy, unless she understands and chooses the full import of the alchemical marriage and its much deeper implications? How much of it depends on whether the husband is a true partner or just the beneficiary of an oppressive system?
It’s a blessing to understand this. And coincidentally (?) the same theme I heard last week from a priest in the Christian Community. You and Judith are both treasures and bring light to this world. Thank you.
ahem, this was in no way a "mis-translation" (imo) ... Thank you for this.
Yeah, it would take a lot to convince me this wasn't done on purpose. You're welcome for this. PS Thank you for you.
Yesterday's blog was so ... wow. More on it later. This one, though.... That mistranslation is huge. What does a woman look like who is not being seductive, not dressing/performing for the gaze of men or in competition with other women? Who is being only her full, true self, regardless of her relationships? Can she stay in a marriage if the institution itself is based on patriarchy, unless she understands and chooses the full import of the alchemical marriage and its much deeper implications? How much of it depends on whether the husband is a true partner or just the beneficiary of an oppressive system?
That key. What a portal.
You know how I always say, the answer incarnates with the question? This is that. The key brings us the lock that it opens.